Report of case study of Winterbourne View

Introduction:What are the key Legislations and national Policy, Organisational Policy, Statutory Guidance and Code of Practice that should have been in place in Winterbourne View?Describe relationship between law, policy and ethics in relation to practice that was demonstrated at WinterbourneExplain in detail the shortfalls in patient’s safety and care were that related to the law, policy and ethics at WinterbourneWhat laws and policy were not being adhered To Winterbourne View and what was the outcome for not following the laws and policy in placeCritically review the ways in which workers at Winterbourne could have ensured compliance with relevant Legislation and national policy through ethical practiceCompare National and Organisational Policy against the national professional standard and how they impact on practice in health and social careAnalyse the impact equality legislation and equity has when safeguarding individuals in relation to Winterbourne View.What are the key Legislations and national Policy, Organisational Policy, Statutory Guidance and Code of Practice that should have been in place in Winterbourne View?A few patients had been at first ‘segmented’ under the terms of the Mental Health Act, and afterward stayed at Winterbourne after this time of being separated finished. Others were conceded on a casual premise and after that moved toward becoming ‘segmented’ after affirmation.The Key Legislation are Health and social care act 2012Equality act 2010Social value act 2012All this legislation is not followed at Winterbourne and the patients suffer traumas because of that.Today CQC distributes the discoveries following an examination of administrations gave at Winterbourne View. In the wake of considering a scope of proof monitors presume that the enlisted supplier, Castle beck Care (Teasdale) Ltd, had neglected to guarantee that individuals living at Winterbourne View were enough shielded from hazard, including the dangers of perilous practices by its own staff.The report presumes that there was a fundamental inability to ensure individuals or to research charges of maltreatment. The supplier had bombed in its legitimate obligation to tell the Care Quality Commission of genuine occurrences including wounds to patients or events when they had disappeared. Reviewers said that staff did not seem to comprehend the necessities of the general population in their consideration, grown-ups with learning handicaps, complex needs and testing conduct. Individuals who had no foundation in consideration administrations had been enrolled, references were not constantly checked, and staff were not prepared or regulated legitimately. Some staff were too prepared to even think about using techniques for limitation without thinking about choices. The audit started following CQC was educated that the BBC TV program Panorama had assembled proof more than a while including mystery taping to demonstrate genuine maltreatment of patients at the inside.National policy:The managers did not ensure that major incidents were reported to the Care Quality Commission as required.Planning and delivery of care did not meet people’s individual needs.They did not have robust systems to assess and monitor the quality of services.They did not identify, and manage, risks relating to the health, welfare and safety of patients.They had not responded to or considered complaints and views of people about the service.Investigations into the conduct of staff were not robust and had not safeguarded people.They did not take reasonable steps to identify the possibility of abuse and prevent it before it occurred.They did not respond appropriately to allegations of abuse.They did not have arrangements in place to protect the people against unlawful or excessive use of restraint.They did not operate effective recruitment procedures or take appropriate steps in relation to persons who were not fit to work in care settings.They failed in their responsibilities to provide appropriate training and supervision to staffCQC,,2011, CQC report on Winterbourne View confirms its owners failed to protect people from abuse, Available at: https://www.cqc.org.uk/news/releases/cqc-report-winterbourne-view-confirms-its-owners-failed-protect-people-abuse Accessed at :16/03/2019A Code of training can be an archive that supplements word related wellbeing and security laws and guidelines to give nitty gritty down to earth direction on the most proficient method to consent to lawful commitments, and should be pursued except if another arrangement with the equivalent or better wellbeing and security standard is in place,[1] or might be a report for a similar reason distributed by an automatic body to be trailed by part organisations.Codes of training distributed by governments don’t supplant the word related wellbeing and security laws and guidelines and are by and large issued regarding those laws and guidelines. They are expected help see how to conform to the prerequisites of guidelines. A working environment controller can allude to a code of training when issuing an improvement or disallowance notice, and they might be permissible in court procedures. A court may utilize a code of training to build up what is sensibly practicable activity to deal with a hazard. Identical or better methods for accomplishing the required work wellbeing and security might be conceivable, so consistence with codes of training isn’t typically compulsory, giving that any elective frameworks utilized give a standard of wellbeing and security equivalent to or superior to those suggested by the code of practice.Authoritative codes of training don’t have a similar specialist under law yet fill a comparable need. Part associations by and large attempt to consent to the codes of training as a state of participation and may lose enrolment whenever observed to be infringing upon the code.Describe relationship between law, policy and ethics in relation to practice that was demonstrated at WinterbourneThe relationship between law, policy and ethics are that they go hand in hand, they can work right one without another.Laws are set to keep the quality service in Hight standards and to protect the service user.At Winterbourne View none of law, policy or ethics are follow, people are abused and tortured, and their Human rights are not even considered.People are been abused and authority failed to help them even if there was many complains about abuze.Authority competent faild to do somting about it ,they don’t do nothing until the case become public.Explain in detail the shortfalls in patient’s safety and care were that related to the law, policy and ethics at WinterbourneThe shortfalls not related to law, policy and ethics are :1.The humen Right are not adhered,people been abused and they not respect there right at all.Example Simone bing pin under the chair and slaped over the face People are being pocket into the eyes and bulled at the point they want to jump over a building, poured on them with could wither at the point of trembling because of cold water and cold weather.Shortfalls are:Abuse of patientsManagers don’t do nothingDon’t report abuse Comunication was inexistentActivity for pation don’t exist…etcWhat laws and policy were not being adhered To Winterbourne View and what was the outcome for not following the laws and policy in placeLaw Law and legislation is the act or proces of making law,laws colectively are known like legislation regulates the way of living and improve the life of people. Legislation determinates the frameworks of policy and reflects the differents rights of organisations grups and individuals. Regulation of health care in England comprises two main elements: Regulaton of the quality and safety of care offerd by health care providers,currently undertaken by the Care Quality Commisions(CQC),and regulation of the market !in health care services,currently the responsibility of Monitor ,in relation to fondation trust)and the department of health. Kingsfunds,2019,Regulation healthcare England,[online]Available at:https://www.kingfund.org.uk/projects/nhs-white-paper/health-careregulationsAccessed at 10/February 2019. The abuse in Winterbourne View Hospital came to light the first time in 2011.The hospital with 24 beds is registred to provide assissment treatment and rehabilitation for people with learning desabilitys and autism. So evrything is divided in Two main inssuies: 1. Individual failing that occurred at multiple levels,that rezultet in the abuse of Winterbourne View . 2. And the inssuie of the care sistem in all contry is the same or not. So the laws not adhered at Winterbourne View are: • Human right act 1998 Because the right of the patients are not being considerated and this is one of the reason the abuse happen. • The health and safety at work act 1974 • Reporting of injuries,Diseases and Dangeros ocurrements Regulation,1995 The bad managing of health and safety,notbreport inccidents by the staff or nurses,they don’t give the first aid to patients,they didn’t move or handling people in correct way. Bitec,2019,Relevant legislation and organisational policy and proceduresv[online]Available at:www.hise.gov.ukAccessed 10 February 2019. ➢ The equality act,2010 Because people are not treated in the same way and thos leed to multiply abuse in the hospital. ➢ Care standarts act,2000 The standarts of Winterbourne were not fowllowed at al land this lead tu abuse. PAGINA 2 If the staff of Winterbourne View report injures and stop them from happening,this would be diffrent today,but this rwgulations were not adhered and these leed to multiple abuse at different levels in the hospital. The laws and organisationals policy are: ➢ Important in formation of the Mental health act(1993) ➢ Important information on the Care act(2014) ➢ Human Right act(1998) National Policy: ➢ Nhs England”Our policy and procedures” ➢ Nhs mandate(2018 to 2019) ➢ National framework for Nhs continuing Healthcare and Nhs-Funded nursing care ➢ Mental health policy in England. The failings in the care home at Winterbourn was: ➢ The concern raised went unheeded ➢ Patients report of abouse was ignored ➢ Warnig signs were not picked up by relevant authoritys. ➢ There were a light numbers of phisical interventions,one patient was reported by being restrained 45 times in the space of five months. The outcome was that 6 care workers of Winterbourne View care home were given prision time for cruelty and degrading abuse of disabled patients.Another 5 staff members of the privat home in Handbrook South Gloucestershire ,receved suspended sentences. The 11 defendants-9 suport workers and-2 nurses-admitted 38 charges or either neglect or ill-tratment of 5 people with severe learnig difficultys after being secretly recorded by reporter for the BBC Panorama programme. They were filmed slaping extremly vurnerable rezidents,sooking them in water,tapping them under chairs,taunting and swering at them,pulling ther hair and poking ther eyes.Whistleblower,Terry Bryan a former nurse at the home,contacted the BBC after his warnings were ignored by Castleck Ltd,which owned the hospital,and care watchdogs.Hours of recording in 5 week of undercover BBC investogations,that showed the suport worker buling patients verbal and fizic toghether with others suport workers.The patients were moved close from home were they are closet o family and people they love them and not abuse them.Critically review the ways in which workers at Winterbourne could have ensured compliance with relevant Legislation and national policy through ethical practiceOn 12 May 2011, CQC was educated that the BBC TV program Panorama had assembled proof more than a while to demonstrate genuine maltreatment of patients at Winterbourne View. A multi-organization shielding meeting was hung on 13 May to incorporate a portion of the 10 NHS associations and committees who were dispatching care from Winterbourne View, alongside the protecting expert, South Gloucestershire Council, the police and CQC. That day, we met with the supplier Castlebeck Care Ltd, to look for confirmations that every new affirmation would stop until all examinations were finished. The supplier gave verbal affirmations and disclosed to us that while examinations were finished in connection to the defending data that had been gotten they would stop admissions to Winterbourne View with quick impact. This was followed up recorded as a hard copy by the supplier. We looked for further affirmations from the supplier to guarantee the proceeded with suspension of new situations on Monday 23 May 2011. By 18 May the supplier had suspended 15 staff and courses of action were made to acquire brief staff to give extra cover. While the quick need for all offices was to guarantee the wellbeing and welfare of the general population living there, CQC likewise thought about whether to make further move under the Wellbeing and Social Care Act 2008. We completed this survey to look in more prominent detail at the benchmarks of consideration at Winterbourne View, and to cover their frameworks to secure the wellbeing and welfare of the general population who were utilizing this administration.connection to eight parts of the basic models of value and security:  Care and welfare of individuals who use administrations  Safeguarding individuals who use administrations from maltreatment  Management of meds  Requirements identifying with specialists  Supporting specialists  Assessing and observing the nature of administration arrangement  Complaints  Records How we did this audit As a component of this audit we chose to catch up the particular data given by the TV journalist and the informant, to analyze the consideration gave to individuals and the defending and administration frameworks which were in presence at Winterbourne View. The TV report gave clear proof which was not accessible from different sources, however we expected to substantiate that by alluding to the emergency clinic’s own records, and addressing staff and patients straightforwardly. We analyzed most of the data we held about this supplier. On 17, 18, and 24 May and on 2 June 2011, we did site visits at Winterbourne View. We seen in detail how individuals were being thought about, we conversed with 10 individuals The enrolled individual had not made reasonable courses of action that were powerful to recognize and keep maltreatment from occurring. They had not reacted fittingly to claims that misuse had happened or was in danger of striking guarantee individuals were secured. Thusly the general population, obliged at Winterbourne View, were not completely shielded from maltreatment, or the danger of maltreatment. Result 9: People ought to be given the medications they need when they need them, and safe The enlisted supplier did not completely ensure individuals against the dangers related with the hazardous use and the board of me who utilized the administration, we conversed with 25 individuals from staff, we checked the enrolled Compare National and Organisational Policy against the national professional standard and how they impact on practice in health and social careAll organisations will have their own set of organisational policies.What is organizational policies and procedures?A set of policies are principles, rules, and guidelines formulated or adopted by an organisation to reach its long-term goals and typically published in a booklet or other form that is widely accessible.Abuse Prevention PolicyAbuse Reporting ProcedureAccepting Money and Gifts PolicyAccident and Incident PolicyAdaptations and Equipment PolicyAdmission PolicyAdult Protection PolicyAdvocacy PolicyETCNational policyComplaints PolicySocial media and comment moderation policyPatient and public participation policySafeguarding policyInformation Security PolicyInformation Sharing PolicyConfidentiality PolicyData Protection PolicyFreedom of Information policyComparing national vs organisational policy they bout safeguarded the right of patients and practitioners in care setting, sets of rule that should work together for a better quality care.Analyse the impact equality legislation and equity has when safeguarding individuals in relation to Winterbourne View.Equality is given everybody the same treatment give them everyone the same things and rights.Equity is being impartial and fare giving patients what they need no watt they are right for themThe different between equality and equity is that equality is giving patients same treatment and don’t take counts of needs or fairness only about equal rights, on the other hand Equity is about giving patient wat they ned because different individuals always have different views and needs do is being far to people giving exactly the necessary.Bibliographies:❖ SCIE.org.uk(2018)Mental capacity act(2005) at a glance[online]Available at :https://www.SCIE.org.uk/MCA/introduction/Mental-capacity-act-2005- at-a-glance Accessed 10 February 2019.❖ Https://www.SCIE.org.uk /Publication/Guides/Guide15/Legislation/Otherlegislation/vulnerablepeopl legislation > Accessed 10 February 2019 ❖ Bolton, Land Barton,L(2018)Principles of the care act 2014 [online]The hub/Hight speed training,Avalible at: https://www.Hightspeedtraining.co.uk/Hub/Principles-of-the-carw-act2014> Accessed 10 February 2019 ❖ Bitec 2019,Relevant legislation and organisational policy and procedures[online]Avalible at www.Hise.gov.uk Accessed 10 February 2019 ❖ Kings funds ,2019,Regulation healthcare England [online]Avaliable at: Https://www.kingfund.org.uk/projects/nhs-white-paper/health-careregulation ,Accessed 10 February 2019.CQC,,2011, CQC report on Winterbourne View confirms its owners failed to protect people from abuse, Available at: https://www.cqc.org.uk/news/releases/cqc-report-winterbourne-view-confirms-its-owners-failed-protect-people-abuse Accessed at :16/03/2019

Our dedicated nursing writer will craft your paper of
any complexity
FOR YOU

just from only $13.90/page


order my paper

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

x

Hello, dear nurse!

We are happy to help with your assignment, so please place your order using the link below!

Click here to proceed