We live in a society where the death is a daunting force. This is not very helpful since we have to talk specifically about death and passing. Instead of increasing death we need to lower it. With regards to therapeutic help with death, we have to realize the values and beliefs included. All life is valuable, all living persons are deserving of appreciation, thoughtfulness and honor. Everyone has self governing rights over their end of life choices. It is not the job of health care professionals to pass judgment onto others. It was an illegal act to help another person end his or her life but eventually, authorized therapeutic help with death was permitted under Bill-C-14 (Speaker of HOC, 2016). Religious condemnation and moral disapproval of suicide by society were associated with its criminalization in most societies before modern times (Gopal, 2015). The aim of this paper is intended to allow readers to fundamentally evaluate, inside the Canadian setting, the ethical reasoning, and theory based practice of medical assisted death. Research has shown that the most vital effect on a patient’s choices, is his or her values and beliefs and social norms.Health care professionals experience ethical dilemmas more frequently than we know. Sometimes, what is preferred for a patient may not be able to be provided. This is simply caused by a lack of assets. In Canada, based on certain regions, some people do not have the access to end of life/palliative care. Care providers are working a lot more effectively and rapidly with less assets and funding. It is important to plan, go through the issue, identify all the possible resources, and balance the benefits with the disadvantages, as this can help determine a better outcome. A palliative approach incorporates palliative care in all forms of wellbeing in order to help individuals formulate a thorough understanding of death, which might be years away or possibly even sooner. It is a great approach that may be put forward by health care providers to allow them to have a discussion, while also supporting the patients and their families around Medical Assistance in Death. Families are extremely grateful for this care. They are relieved to see how peacefully their loved one dies and feel a sense of release from their own suffering as they witness that person’s decline. Of course they are sad, and hugs go all around. But they tell us that their loved one died on his or her own terms and they view this outcome as positive. Follow-up telephone calls to families several days after each medically assisted death have all been very positive, with no regrets expressed by the family. My colleague and I have not second-guessed the care in our cases (reid, 2018). End of life care is another approach, as it incorporates further care arrangements, which guarantees the client’s wishes are known, followed up on, and made a priority, thus allowing decision making to be easier. Health professionals are seeing a pattern and are growing more and more concerned that people are choosing medical assisted death due to being afraid of a painful death or lack of support from family caregivers. This proves that if there were stronger services for end of life care and palliative care, the amount of people that would decide to go with medically assisted death, would lower significantly. Society’s focus at the end of life should be on efforts to address suffering and the needs of patients and families, including improving access to effective hospice and palliative care (Sulmasy & Mueller, 2017).Deontology is a theory that worries about the obligations we have to other people. According to deontology, following obligations and being reliable is what makes an activity ethically right. For instance, if coming clean to patients is a flat out obligation, in light of individuals, at that point we should come clean no matter the result. Deontology is good when you pursue total veracity, such as not stealing, and not deceiving. There are a few issues that come with deontology. This can happen when trying to figure out exactly what the obligations are, figuring out which responsibility/task is more crucial than the other; if there is more than one on hand. Between religion and wanting to do the right thing, there is conflict that grows within the two duties. Some religions might believe that the ending of life through assistance is opposed to their belief of a natural death, so worshipers of this faith cannot take part in medical assisted death. The responsibility is to respect the right to life and also the responsibility to respect the client’s religious beliefs. Utilitarianism determines right and wrong of a choice through its outcome. The action is ethical in the event that it limits negative results and increases positive results. Utilitarianism is utilized for general well being, for example isolating and immunizing individuals in order to promote safety control. There are a couple of issues that come with utilitarianism also. The first being that you can’t generally anticipate the results and outcomes. Secondly, what one individual may consider to be a decent result, can be a horrible end result to someone else. When handling medical assisted death it is important that ethical principles are provided. Clients have the right to act on a self governed plan, and it is crucial that their autonomy is respected because at the end of the day it is their life. When it comes to providing care, it is important to ensure that all persons are receiving fair care, no matter their race, gender, and religion. Nonmaleficence is always balanced and compared to beneficence. As stated earlier, although the immunization shot may have hurt the patient, the good of the injection outweighed the pain from the injection. In dealing with ethical problems, moral responses need to be applied. The expressive level, essentially expresses feelings without supplying any reasoning for beliefs, such as “I’m against medical assisted death because killing is not right”. Pre-intelligent level is the decision made by an external input without basic reflection, to give an example, “I disapprove of medical assisted death because my job demands that I cannot do no harm”. Lastly comes the reflective level in which case ethical decision making is used, “I disagree with medical assisted death, because my duty to do no harm, outweighs the autonomy of an individual to pick”. Any type of carelessness falls under incapacity/incompetence. During the occurrence of unintended carelessness, the lawful concern is a form of compensation rather than discipline for the healthcare provider. Although, the medical staff who are observed to be careless, may likewise be subject to disciplinary activity from the CNO (Kozier, 2017).Furthermore, the principles at stake also underlie medicine’s responsibilities on other issues and the physician’s duty to provide care based on clinical judgment, evidence, and ethics. Control over the manner and timing of a person’s death has not been and should not be a goal of medicine (Sulmasy & Mueller, 2017). Moral courage is needed in the world of ethics in healthcare. Ethical theories don’t always provide a clear answer to difficult problems but they help us to better understand the values and attitudes of others by emphasizing the different ways people can approach the same problem. Nurses have a code of ethics, but the code of ethics cannot be lawfully authorized by others. However, every profession has the legal right to sanction members for failure to adhere to their ethical responsibilities and duties. Code of Ethics doesn’t tell you what actions to take. It just tells you about the values and responsibilities you should consider.